Legal Opinion

Vespers v. Springs Mills, Inc.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 5, 1981No. 21403PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ness, Justice:

This is an appeal from an order of the circuit court holding that the South Carolina Industrial Commission did not have jurisdiction over appellant Edna Vespers’ occupational disease claim. We reverse.

*96Appellant was employed by respondent Springs Mills, Inc., for a period of nine months before she filed her claim for the occupational disease, byssinosis. Prior to this employment in South Carolina, she had been exposed to cotton dust in the same type of employment (textiles) for seventeen years in North Carolina.

The sole issue raised is whether appellant’s claim satisfies the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Drake v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  2. Glenn v. Columbia Silica Sand Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1960
  3. Simpkins v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
  4. Owens v. HerndonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1969
  5. Hines v. Hendricks Canning Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1975

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Rueda v. Utah Labor Comm'nUtah Supreme Court · 2017
  2. Talley v. John-Mansville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Grice v. Graniteville Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1982
  4. South Carolina Workers' Compensation Commission v. WestPoint Home, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2025
  5. Talley v. John-Mansville Sales Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API