Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Utilities District v. Pelton

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1990No. 88-648PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendant-appellant, Delbert L. Pelton, brings this appeal from a judgment of the district court for Douglas County. Plaintiff-appellee, Metropolitan Utilities District of Omaha (MUD), brought an action in district court seeking payment for utilities furnished to 1540 Willis Avenue in Omaha. After a trial where Pelton appeared pro se, the court found in favor of MUD and entered judgment in the amount of $6,733.95. Pelton timely appealed to this court.

Pelton’s assignments of error can be summarized as contending that the trial court’s finding of defendant’s liability for utility debts was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howells Elevator, Inc. v. Stanco Farm Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Otoe County National Bank v. FroelichNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Hughes v. Cornhusker Casualty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Laird v. Scribner Coop, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  2. K & K Farming, Inc. v. Federal Intermediate Credit BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  3. City of LaVista v. AndersenNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Paul H. Schwendener, Inc. v. Larrabee Commons PartnersAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003
  5. T.O. Haas Tire Co. v. Futura Coatings, Inc.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API