Legal Opinion

T.O. Haas Tire Co. v. Futura Coatings, Inc.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided September 14, 1993No. A-91-056PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Norton, District Judge, Retired.

T.O. Flaas Tire Company, Inc. (Haas), plaintiff in the original action, appeals from an award of $6,000 against Futura Coatings, Inc. (Futura), by the district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, in which the trial court found a breach of an express warranty on Futura’s roof materials used by Haas to coat the roof on a new building. Haas alleges two errors: (1) the trial court’s finding that the roof could have been repaired at any time at a cost of $6,000 and (2) the trial court’s refusal to find that the actual cost of repair, that being $46,000 plus $6,000…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Mennonite Deaconess Home & Hospital, Inc. v. Gates Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Nebraska Builders Products Co. v. Industrial Erectors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Hillcrest Country Club v. N.D. Judds Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Plante v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  5. State v. WilcoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lincoln Composites, Inc. v. Firetrace USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Creighton University v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2009
  3. Bay Construction Co. v. DolanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API