T.O. Haas Tire Co. v. Futura Coatings, Inc.
Nebraska Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Norton, District Judge, Retired.
T.O. Flaas Tire Company, Inc. (Haas), plaintiff in the original action, appeals from an award of $6,000 against Futura Coatings, Inc. (Futura), by the district court for Lancaster County, Nebraska, in which the trial court found a breach of an express warranty on Futura’s roof materials used by Haas to coat the roof on a new building. Haas alleges two errors: (1) the trial court’s finding that the roof could have been repaired at any time at a cost of $6,000 and (2) the trial court’s refusal to find that the actual cost of repair, that being $46,000 plus $6,000…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Mennonite Deaconess Home & Hospital, Inc. v. Gates Engineering Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Nebraska Builders Products Co. v. Industrial Erectors, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Hillcrest Country Club v. N.D. Judds Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Plante v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
- State v. WilcoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Lincoln Composites, Inc. v. Firetrace USA, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Creighton University v. General Electric Co.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2009
- Bay Construction Co. v. DolanNebraska Court of Appeals · 1994