Omaha & Council Bluffs Street Railway Co. v. Interstate Commerce Commission
Supreme Court of the United States
APPEAL PROM THE COMMERCE COURT. Motion for order to maintain the status quo pending appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. The final decree dismissing the bill dissolved the preliminary injunction. 22 Cyc. 981; 1 Joyce on Injunctions, §§ 3306, 330c; 10 Ency. Pl. and Pr. 1029; Hovey v. MacDonald, 109 U. S. 150, 158, 161; Sweeney v. Handley, 126 Fed.
Read the full summary
APPEAL PROM THE COMMERCE COURT. Motion for order to maintain the status quo pending appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion. The final decree dismissing the bill dissolved the preliminary injunction. 22 Cyc. 981; 1 Joyce on Injunctions, §§ 3306, 330c; 10 Ency. Pl. and Pr. 1029; Hovey v. MacDonald, 109 U. S. 150, 158, 161; Sweeney v. Handley, 126 Fed. Rep. 97, 99. When the preliminary injunction has thus been dissolved it cannot -be' revived except by a new exercise of judicial power, and the appeal from the final decree dismissing'the bill does not affect the dissolution of the…
1Per curiam
Upon the authority of Revised Statutes, § 716; Ex parte Milwaukee Railroad Co., 5 Wall. 188; Leonard v. Ozark Co., 115 U. S. 465, 468; In re Classen, 140 U. S. 200, 207; In re McKenzie, 180 U. S. 536, 549; United States v. Shipp, 203 U. S. 563, 573; and upon full consideration of the facts bearing upon the propriety of the appellants’ motion for an order to maintain the status quo pending.this appeal, it is ordered that the enforcement of the order of the Interstate Commerce Commission entered November 27,1909, and drawn in question in this case; be, and it is, suspended and enjoined during…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. ShippSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- In Re ClaasenSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- ALEXANDER McKENZIESupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Leonard v. Ozark Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Ex Parte the Milwaukee Railroad Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1867
3Cited by4 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Kiefer v. City of Idaho FallsIdaho Supreme Court · 1928
- Louisville & N. R. v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1915
- Omaha & CB St. Ry. Co. v. Int. Com. Comm.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911