Louisville & N. R. v. United States
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
On motion to modify decree.
1Per curiam
In the opinion heretofore handed down in this cause, it was directed that a decree be entered denying the motion of the petitioners for an interlocutory injunction and dismissing the petition. Before the entry of such decree the petitioners moved the court to modify the proposed order by granting them an interlocutory injunction pending an appeal to the Supreme Court, or otherwise by proper order maintaining the status quo until such appeal should be decided, upon such terms as to execution of bond and prosecution of the appeal as the court might deem proper. This motion has been heard by the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Hovey v. McDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- Cotting v. Kansas City Stock-Yards Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kansas · 1897
- Louisville & N. R. v. SilerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Kentucky · 1911
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Louisville & N. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Alabama · 1899
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Virginian Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Shinholt v. AngleCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- McBride v. Western Union Telegraph Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1948