Legal Opinion

W. T. Hanson Co. v. Collier

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1906Published

Motion to. strike out certain portions of defendants’ answer as irrelevant and redundant, and motion for a bill of particulars.

1Opinion of the CourtYaw Ejbic, J.

Two motions are presented to the court in the above-entitled action, which is an action brought to recover damages for the publication of an alleged libelous article. The first motion is to strike out certain portions of the defendants’ answer as irrelevant and redundant. The second motion is for a bill of particulars.

In order to avoid a repetition of the facts the determination of the court upon both motions will be stated in this memorandum.

The paragraphs of the complaint are not numbered and so will be referred to by folios.

In the first and second folios of the complaint the defendants are…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. John D. Park & Sons Co. v. National Wholesale Druggists' Ass'nAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Dovan v. DinsmoreNew York Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Stokes v. StokesNew York Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Schroeder v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Smith v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API