Legal Opinion

Heid v. Mohr

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 24, 2022No. 2:18-cv-00311Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO EASTERN DIVISION RAY SCOTT HEID, et al., Plaintiff, Case No. 2:18-cv-311 v. Chief Judge Algenon L. Marbley Magistrate Judge Elizabeth P. Deavers GARY MOHR, et al., Defendants. OPINION AND ORDER This matter is before the Court for consideration of the Motion by Leave of Court to Compel Defendants to Provide Adequate Responses to Discovery Request (ECF No. 184 (the “Second Motion to Compel”)) and the Motion by Leave of Court to Supplement Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendants to Provide Adequate Responses to Discovery…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sharon Surles, by Next Friend Jayneice Johnson, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Greyhound Lines, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  2. Bush v. Dictaphone Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Misco, Inc., Mid-South Aluminum Company, and Everett W. Fielder, Jr. v. United States Steel Corporation and Alside, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  4. Jenetta W. Pickens v. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Lantz v. New York Central RailroadDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API