Legal Opinion

York v. Unqualified Washington County Elected Officials

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1986No. 19985PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant William M. York filed in the district court a pro se “Request for Declaratory Judgment,” accusing unnamed Washington County elected officials of being unqualified to hold public office. After rulings by the district court on various motions to dismiss and to quash service, York filed an amended petition specifically naming as defendants the elected officials of the county.1 The amended petition was *680also dismissed by an order of dismissal entered on March 14, 1984, which allowed the plaintiff leave to amend.

Thereafter, York chose not to amend his petition, but instead filed a “Motion…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Baird v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Hoyle v. MonsonUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Sun Land & Cattle Co. v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Peay v. PeayUtah Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. HerreraUtah Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Provo City Corp. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Gregory v. ShurtleffUtah Supreme Court · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API