United States v. Michael
U S Air Force Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
O’BRIEN, Chief Judge:
Sergeant Timothy J. Michael was convicted of wrongfully using amphetamines because three airmen said he did. They claimed that on 20 May, Michael participated when they used “crank” (amphetamine) at an apartment shared by two of these airmen, again later in a parked car, and yet again back at the apartment. Appellant complains that this evidence is legally and factually insufficient to establish that he used an illegal substance.
The Court of Military Appeals has clearly set out the standard for reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence:
The test for…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. TurnerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. RushatzUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. RoundsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- State v. ReynoldsNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. DeseranoUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
- United States v. FolkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993