Legal Opinion

T.H. v. R.C.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 2006No. 20050059PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEHRING, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

11 We granted certiorari to consider the custody of a young boy, E.H. In particular, we will review whether the court of appeals erred when it placed EH. in the custody of his biological mother under the terms of a stipulation that the district court refused to enforce.

1 2 The parties are TH., the birth mother, R.C. and S.C., the adoptive parents, and Families for Children, an adoption agency. The proceeding in this court is the latest, but sadly not the last, act in a very human saga that has played out on the stage of our courts. Despite our determination that…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Washakie County School District Number One v. HerschlerWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  3. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Jenkins v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Graham v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Supernova Media, Inc. v. Shannon's Rainbow, LLCUtah Supreme Court · 2013
  2. R.P. v. K.S.W.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2014
  3. B.J.M. v. B.S.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2012
  4. Kamoe v. Hon. RidgeUtah Supreme Court · 2021
  5. In Re Adoption of A.F.K.Court of Appeals of Utah · 2009

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API