Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Parrinello

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 17, 1995PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Respondent’s notice of appeal from a "judgment and order” entered February 14, 1994 purports to bring up for review two earlier orders, dated November 6, 1991 and August 17, 1993. The "judgment and

*1007order” is not in fact a final judgment because Surrogate’s Court ordered "that all terms, conditions, manner and distribution of all proceeds of the sale will be determined by further Order of the Court”, and we treat it as an order (see, Burke v Crosson, 85 NY2d 10). It does not bring up those earlier orders for review (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [l];…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Burke v. CrossonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. In re the Estate of PiccioneNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  3. Crystal v. ManesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re the Estate of RosenhainAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  5. Lincoln First Bank, N. A. v. SanfordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. ZimmerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Hoffman v. HoffmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. FOX, TRACY v. COLEMAN, CARMENAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API