Overstreet v. Lucid USA Incorporated
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion
1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Cornele A Overstreet, No. CV-24-01356-PHX-DJH 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 Lucid USA Incorporated, 13 Respondent. 14 15 Respondent Lucid USA Incorporated (“Respondent” or “Lucid”) seeks to dismiss 16 this case in its entirety under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) for lack of subject 17 matter jurisdiction. (Doc. 55 at 1). Lucid argues that the structure of the National Labor 18 Relations Board (“NLRB”) is unconstitutional. (Id.) It specifically argues that (1) the 19 NLRB’s Board Members and (2) its…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Lee v. City Of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.