Legal Opinion

Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided September 24, 2009No. Case 05-40188PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION RE: DOC. 318

AVERN COHN, District Judge.

This is a patent case involving the drug repaglinide marketed by Novo Nordisk (Novo) under the trade name Prandin. Now before the Court is Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories’ (Caraco) Motion for Summary Judgment on Count IV of Its Third Amended Counterclaim and Sixth Affirmative Defense for Patent Misuse (Dkt. 318). The background of the case as well as Caraco’s motion is described in the Court’s decisions reported at 450 F.Supp.2d 757 (E.D.Mich.2006) (finding allegations of complainant sufficient to state a claim against Sun) and 2009 WL…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
  2. Novo Nordisk v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  2. Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2011
  3. Novo Nordisk A/s v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  4. Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  5. Novo Nordisk A/S v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API