Legal Opinion
United Verde Copper Co. v. Jordan
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 2, 1926No. 4735PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNT, Circuit Judge.
Defendants in error, called plaintiffs, recovered verdict and judgment for damages to crops, trees, and vines of plaintiffs and their assignors, caused by smoke, fuines, and gases from the smelter of plaintiff in error, called defendant. To review the judgment this writ of error was brought.
In the first of seven counts in the complaint, plaintiffs sued for damages to their own crops, trees, and hedges, while in the other six counts they sued as assignees for damages done to the crops of other persons, General demurrer to the complaint was overruled, and defendant answered…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Camfield v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. HillmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Arizona Copper Co. v. GillespieSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Ingersoll v. GourleyWashington Supreme Court · 1913
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
- Chenega Corp. v. Exxon Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Conley v. Amalgamated Sugar Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Atkin F. Seltzer and Helen Seltzer, His Wife v. William W. Chesley, Jr., as Special Administrator of the Estate of Linda Joyce Berryhill, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- Andrew Stewart v. P.O. Gary Lattanzi, Donna M. Mills, Hearing Officer, and William J. Brianwell, CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.