Legal Opinion

In re Ver Dught

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided February 25, 1992No. 73066PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORIGINAL DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING

RENDLEN, Judge.

In this disciplinary proceeding respondent is charged with subornation of perjury, presenting false evidence and engaging in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice in his representation of a client before a federal Administrative Law Judge (AU). The sections allegedly violated are, 3.3(a)(1), (2), (4), 3.3(a), (b), and 8.4(c), (d), Rule 4 of the Rules of Professional Conduct.

After hearing, the Special Master found respondent guilty of having violated the cited rules and recommended a 90-day suspension from the practice of law. Fully…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Olson v. Auto Owners Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. In Re WaldronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. In re ElliottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  4. In re AdelmanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  5. In re GraySupreme Court of Missouri · 1991

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In Re StormentSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Cohn v. Commission for Lawyer Discipline, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  3. In Re Attorney Discipline MatterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  4. In re FrankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  5. In re: Sanford P. KrigelSupreme Court of Missouri · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API