Legal Opinion

Muhammad v. George Hyman Construction

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 27, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lehner, J.), entered on or about May 17, 1994, which, insofar as appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability under Labor Law § 240 (1), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that apparent inconsistencies between plaintiff’s deposition testimony and his affidavit in support of the motion raise an issue of fact whether the carpenter’s stud that allegedly struck plaintiff and caused him to fall from a ladder came from above him, and was thus an elevation-related hazard covered by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Urrea v. Sedgwick Avenue AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. Robinson v. NAB Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
  3. Brooks v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Forest City Jay Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  2. Cook v. Presbyterian Homes of Western New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. Ortega v. Catamount Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Phillips v. Amusements of Rochester, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API