Phillips v. Amusements of Rochester, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs’ son was injured on an amusement park ride owned and operated by defendant. The ride, called the Gravitron, rotates in a circular motion at high speed, and centrifugal force pushes riders back against their seats. Riders do not wear safety belts. Plaintiffs allege that the centrifugal force sucked their son into a cavity behind his seat, causing him to sustain cuts on his face. Supreme Court erred in granting defendant’s cross motion for summary judgment…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Hourigan v. McGarryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Krampen v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Brancati v. Bar-U-Farm, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Luftig v. SteinhornAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.