Legal Opinion

People v. Markham

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1857PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.

The petitioner was indicted and convicted of the offence of dealing a banking game of cards. The Court below imposed a fine of one hundred dollars, and directed him to he imprisoned until the same was paid.

It is now alleged that the imprisonment was unlawful; First, Because the statute under which the petitioner was convicted, does not direct that a party shall be imprisoned upon the nonpayment of the fine; and Second, Because the judgment of the Court does not specify the length of time of imprisonment.. The four hundred and sixtieth section of the Criminal Prac*209tice Act, page four hundred…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ex parte MooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. In re FantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Perry v. PernetIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Ex Parte CrenshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API