People v. Markham
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMurray, C. J.
The petitioner was indicted and convicted of the offence of dealing a banking game of cards. The Court below imposed a fine of one hundred dollars, and directed him to he imprisoned until the same was paid.
It is now alleged that the imprisonment was unlawful; First, Because the statute under which the petitioner was convicted, does not direct that a party shall be imprisoned upon the nonpayment of the fine; and Second, Because the judgment of the Court does not specify the length of time of imprisonment.. The four hundred and sixtieth section of the Criminal Prac*209tice Act, page four hundred…
2Cited by14 opinions
- Ex parte MooneyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1885
- Dye v. SkeenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1950
- In re FantonNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
- Perry v. PernetIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
- Ex Parte CrenshawSupreme Court of Missouri · 1883
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.