Legal Opinion

Kemp v. Angel

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided December 7, 1977PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARVEL, Chancellor.

Plaintiffs, who are admittedly stockholders of the defendant Aid, Inc., sue derivatively for the alleged benefit of such corporation as well as on the alleged behalf of a class of stockholders consisting of persons other than themselves who are holders of Class A common stock of Aid, Inc., excluding, of course, the defendants Ina Corporation and Ina Capital Corporation against which relief is sought.

According to the complaint herein, the individual defendants are directors of Aid, Inc., certain of them being also officers of such corporation, the defendant Burdge also being…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  2. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Tanzer v. International General Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  4. Beloff v. Consolidated Edison Co. of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. Stauffer v. Standard Brands Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Issen v. GSC Enterprises., Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981
  2. Kidwell v. MeikleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
  3. Roland International Corp. v. NajjarSupreme Court of Delaware · 1979
  4. Kerrigan v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Flynn v. Bass Bros. Enterprises, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API