Legal Opinion
Rodrigue v. Rodrigue
District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Decided February 12, 1999No. Civil Action 95-2862PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND REASONS
LEMMON, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that George Rodrigue’s Motion for Summary Judgment on the Issue of Federal Copyright Law Preemption (document # 96) is GRANTED and Veronica Hidalgo Ro-drigue’s Motion for Summary Judgment (document # 92) is DENIED.
Background
George Rodrigue and Veronica Hidalgo, were married in 1967 and lived together under Louisiana’s community property regime until their divorce in 1994. Termination of the marital community was effective June 9, 1993. George is an artist who created numerous paintings during and after the existence of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gade v. National Solid Wastes Management Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Orson, Inc. T/a Roxy Screening Rooms v. Miramax Film Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999