Legal Opinion

Riemer & Braunstein LLP v. DeGiacomo (A & E 128 North Corp.)

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit

Decided April 2, 2015No. BAP No. MB 14-059; Bankruptcy Nos. 13-16446-HJB, 13-16447-HJBPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TESTER, Bankruptcy Judge.

Riemer & Braunstein LLP (“Riemer”) appeals from the bankruptcy court’s: (1) August 7, 2014 order ruling that Riemer and another creditor, Santander Bank, were not qualified to vote for a permanent chapter 7 trustee under § 702(a),1 and appointing the interim trustee as the permanent trustee; and (2) September 4, 2014 order denying Riemer’s motion for reconsideration. For the reasons set forth below, we AFFIRM.

BACKGROUND

On November 3, 2013, A & E 128 North Corporation (“A & E North”) and A & E 128 South Corporation (“A & E South”) (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. In Re Plaza De Diego Shopping Center, Inc., Debtor. Appeal of Robert L. Coley, Esquire. In Re Petition of Robert L. Coley, EtcCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  3. Vázquez Laboy v. Doral Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2011
  4. In Re PoageUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 1988
  5. Matter of Lindell Drop Forge Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re BarkanyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2015
  2. ETS of Washington LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, District of Columbia · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API