Glovacz v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtVan Nortwick, J.
Susan Caroline Glovacz challenges her conviction for trafficking in hydrocodone raising multiple claims of error. Because the jury instructions given at trial constitute fundamental error, we reverse her conviction and vacate her sentence. Given this disposition, it is unnecessary for us to consider the other issues raised.
By amended information, appellant was charged with trafficking in Lortab in an amount greater than 14 grams but less than 28 grams. At the ensuing trial, the prosecution offered evidence that the controlled substance had been purchased from appellant by an undercover…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Martinez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2008
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- McCoy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
3Cited by6 opinions
- Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Day v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- ACE WEINTRAUB v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2021
- Day v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- James Buhs v. Secretary, Florida Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.