Legal Opinion

In Re Bloomfield Manufacturing Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 8, 1998No. 04-97-00938-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ANGELINI, Justice.

The Bloomfield Manufacturing Company and Hi-Lift Jack Company, relators, have filed a petition for writ of mandamus pursuant to Rule 52 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Relators argue that Judge Carol Haberman abused her discretion when she ordered them to produce a computer database in response to a request for production because the discovery request was overly broad, the database is protected from discovery under the attorney work product and the attorney-client privileges, and a federal court has held the database privileged. Re-lators request that this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Texaco, Inc. v. SandersonTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Loftin v. MartinTexas Supreme Court · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Monsanto Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  2. Clarence Randolph Bryant v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2005
  3. in Re Monsanto Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API