Banack v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
GLICKSTEIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from an amended final summary judgment. The facts show that as the result of an accident with a tractor, Mitch Banack was permanently and totally disabled. His father, appellant in this case (Banack), was then covered by two insurance policies: an automobile liability policy with Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Florida Farm), and a catastrophe excess policy (umbrella policy) with Reserve Insurance Company (Reserve). Appellee contends that as a licensed insurance agent, Banack sold himself both policies. Appellant contends there is a question of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kimbrell v. Great American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
- American Fire & Indem. Co. v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- First State Ins. Co. v. StubbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. FultonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
- Tarlton v. Dixie Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3Cited by2 opinions
- Williams v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
- Williams v. FLORIDA INS. GUAR. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989