Legal Opinion

Banack v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'n

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 1, 1985No. 84-47PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GLICKSTEIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from an amended final summary judgment. The facts show that as the result of an accident with a tractor, Mitch Banack was permanently and totally disabled. His father, appellant in this case (Banack), was then covered by two insurance policies: an automobile liability policy with Florida Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Florida Farm), and a catastrophe excess policy (umbrella policy) with Reserve Insurance Company (Reserve). Appellee contends that as a licensed insurance agent, Banack sold himself both policies. Appellant contends there is a question of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kimbrell v. Great American Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1982
  2. American Fire & Indem. Co. v. SpauldingSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
  3. First State Ins. Co. v. StubbsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. v. FultonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
  5. Tarlton v. Dixie Insurance Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Williams v. Florida Insurance Guaranty Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  2. Williams v. FLORIDA INS. GUAR. ASS'NDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API