Legal Opinion

Poff v. Lockhart

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

The question raised on appeal is whether the southeasterly Cleora drive, as shown by ShimeaH’s map, can be counted as within the 2,650 feet contemplated by sec. 66.296 (1), Stats.

That portion of Cleora drive lying northwest of lot 310 between Burton and Frederick streets was vacated by a petition filed pursuant to sec. 66.296 (1), Stats., which provides:

“Discontinuance of streets and alleys. (1) The whole or any part of any road, street, slip, pier, lane or alley, in any city of the second, third or fourth class or in any incorporated village, may be discontinued by the common council or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Johnston v. LonstorfWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Wray v. Norfolk & Western RailwaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1950

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. K.G.R. Partnership v. Town of East TroyCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  3. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API