Application of Northern States Power Co.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FOLEY, Judge.
We are called upon to review an order by respondent Minnesota Public Utilities Commission which denied reconsideration of a decision in a general rate case filed by Northern States Power Company. The Commission refused to reopen the rate case to allow testimony on a cost study from a prior proceeding upon which the Commission had relied but which was never made a part of the record in the rate case. We reverse and remand.
FACTS
Northern States Power Company is an electric utility subject to regulation by the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission. NSP owns three nuclear…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morgan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sylvester TIPLER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. E. I. duPONT deNEMOURS AND CO., Inc., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
- Vernon Brinker v. Caspar Weinberger, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Lloyd Thompson v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Surf and Sand, Inc. v. GardebringCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Town of Forest Lake v. Minnesota Municipal BoardCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- O'Connor v. State of VermontVermont Superior Court · 2021