Legal Opinion

Brett v. Dean

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 20, 1940No. 5 Div. 326PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOULDIN, Justice.-

Appellant sued appellee on a note and an account. Defendant .pleaded the general issue and payment. In support of the claim on account plaintiff offered a pencil memorandum on a piece of paper in the handwriting of her intestate found among his papers after his death. This document appears in full in the report of the case. This memorandum, offered as a whole, was objected to as- hearsay, and not admissible as a shop book account, kept in regular course of business. Pending this objection it was disclosed that decedent was engaged in a Naval Stores business, kept a regular…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Phoenix City v. TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Hill v. HillSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927
  3. German v. Brown & LeeperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1905
  4. Sharp v. BlantonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915
  5. H. H. Hitt Lumber Co. v. McCormackAlabama Court of Appeals · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Poston v. GaddisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1979
  2. Bank of Southeast v. KoslinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  3. McCary v. McMorrisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  4. Moseley v. Lewis & BrackinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1991
  5. Lambert v. JeffersonAlabama Court of Appeals · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API