Legal Opinion

State v. French

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 30, 1989No. 86-302PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeck, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction by jury of first degree arson. He raises four issues on appeal: (1) whether his right to a speedy trial was violated, in part due to a mistrial; (2) whether his right to confront his accusers was violated by evidentiary rulings of the trial court; and (3) whether the court properly denied defendant’s motion for judgment of acquittal where the verdict depended on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, and (4) whether the judge’s charge to the jury on the issue of uncorroborated testimony was adequate. We affirm.

Defendant was promised a $1,000 payment…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Dickey v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Moore v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. State v. RoySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State v. BrillonSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  2. State v. FullerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. State v. PercySupreme Court of Vermont · 1992
  4. State v. BrochuSupreme Court of Vermont · 2008
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1993

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API