Legal Opinion

In re Joseph H.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2015No. S227929PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDissenting Statement by Liu, J.

**1I write to explain why I believe this case merits our review.

Petitioner Joseph H., at age 10, shot and killed his sleeping father and then confessed to a police detective during a custodial interview. A video recording of the interview shows Joseph sitting on a couch next to his stepmother, Krista McCary, whose husband Joseph had just killed. Riverside Police Detective Roberta Hopewell sat in an adjacent chair; she was courteous and not overbearing. At the beginning of the interview, Detective Hopewell informed Joseph of his Miranda rights, and he purported to waive them. (Miranda v.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Moran v. BurbineSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Roper v. SimmonsSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. Graham v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. I.F. (In re I.F.), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. People v. Doyle, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016
  3. Klink v. ABC Phones of North Carolina, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Las Vegas Sands, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PADistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2023
  5. People v. DoyleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API