Legal Opinion

Lawrence v. Travelers Ins. Co.

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 16, 1934No. 17744PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KIRKPATRICK, District Judge.

This is an interpleader, under which the life insurance company has paid the face value of the policy into court, and the only question is whether the fund shall be paid to the assignee of the policy or to the administrator of the insured.

The parties waived jury trial, and on the hearing the only evidence offered was a stipulation in which all material facts were agreed upon. This stipulation is adopted by the court as findings of fact and may be taken as a special verdict.

Summarized, the facts are that on August 13, 1925, one Walter Scholes took out a policy of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Gordon v. Ware Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
  4. Haberfeld v. MayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Russell v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cochran v. Trans-General Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1999
  2. Travelers Ins. v. ReizizDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1935
  3. Progressive Insurance v. Southern Star International, Inc.High Court of American Samoa · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API