Legal Opinion

Fred D. WAKEFIELD, Petitioner, v. RAILROAD RETIREMENT BOARD, Respondent

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 19, 1997No. 96-2267PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioner Fred Wakefield (“Wakefield”) seeks to have review of a decision of the Railroad Retirement Board (“Board”). The appeal is governed by the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act (“RULA”), and the notice of appeal was filed too late unless some event tolled the time. Because we conclude that no circumstances exist that permit a tolling of the filing period, we dismiss the appeal.

Background

In 1985, an administrator for the Board determined that Wakefield had been overpaid unemployment benefits and was subject to a fraud-disqualification penalty because he had claimed benefits for days he…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. John Raziano, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Anthony Raziano, and Josephine Raziano, Individually v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. Gatewood v. Railroad Retirement BoardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Jackson v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  2. Paul T. Williams v. Larry SimsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  3. Taylor v. Holiday Isle, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2008
  4. Tarria Michelle Horsley v. The University of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Wallace v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2013

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API