Legal Opinion
Meredith v. Meredith
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 22, 1992No. 91-FM-511PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KING, Associate Judge:
In this domestic dispute, the former wife (hereinafter “wife”) appeals from an order of the trial court reducing the amount of alimony to be paid to her by her former husband (hereinafter “husband”). She asks that this court reverse that order and find that there was no material change in circumstances. We affirm.
The parties were divorced in 1980 and the husband was ordered to pay monthly alimony in the amount of $652. In 1990 the husband moved in the trial court to reduce the amount of alimony to be paid by him. After a hearing, the trial judge found that the husband…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Tydings v. TydingsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1975
- Hamel v. HamelDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- Alibrando v. AlibrandoDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1977
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sudderth v. SudderthDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Co-Operative Cit. Mon. v. Pub. Util. Cont., No. Cv94 0364861 (Jun. 21, 1995)Connecticut Superior Court · 1995
- Cox v. Colonial Mobile Home Park, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1993