Legal Opinion
Peter C. Katt v. David Dykhouse, Michigan Commissioner of Insurance and Frank J. Kelley, Attorney General of Michigan
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 23, 1992No. 92-1187PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RALPH B. GUY, Jr., Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, a financial planner, filed this First Amendment action after the Michigan Insurance Commissioner declared that Michigan law bars the plaintiff from providing his clients with certain information concerning the availability of life insurance commission rebates in Florida. The district court held that the First Amendment claim is barred by res judica-ta because the plaintiff could have advanced it during an earlier state court action in which he challenged the provisions of the statute that bar him from offering such rebates in Michigan. We find…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Kwame Ajamu v. City of ClevelandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Lansing Dairy, Inc. v. EspyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- In Re: Seymour Markowitz, Debtor. Seymour Markowitz v. Carolyn CampbellCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Dlx, Inc. v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Carrier Corporation v. Outokumpu OyjCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.