Light v. Ash

Appellants contend on rehearing that this court was in error in holding that the evidence of the oral contract is not clear, convincing, and satisfactory. After a review of this evidence, we conclude that our former opinion reported ante p. 44, 115 N. W. 2d 903, arrives at the correct conclusion on this point.

Appellants insist, however, that the testimony of Allen Light and Amber Ash was clear, convincing, and satisfactory, and was sufficient to make a prima facie case. We think there is an additional reason why the contention of appellants cannot be accepted.

Allen Light is the husband of…