Legal Opinion

Scheid v. Pinkham

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 14, 1965No. 8386PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a case which commenced as a suit for accounting and wound up as a general free-for-all melee.

Plaintiff H. P. Scheid brought suit naming as defendants V. E. Pinkham, V. V. Pinkham, and Ladeo Wood Brick Mills, Limited, a corporation. The substance of plaintiff’s claim was that he was a minority stockholder of the Ladeo Corporation and had been a minority of one on the three-man board of directors; that the two Pink-hams were majority stockholders and constituted the majority of the board of directors, as well as president and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Miller v. Brunson Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Adelstein v. Jefferson Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
  3. Thompson v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. J. G. Jackson Associates v. MosleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
  5. Commercial Nat. Bank of Kansas City, Kan. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Coonis v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Compton v. Williams Bros. Pipeline CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
  3. Scheid v. PinkhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  4. Moore v. LunaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. P. I. C. Leasing, Inc. v. Roy A. Scheperle Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API