Scheid v. Pinkham
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
RUARK, Presiding Judge.
This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in a case which commenced as a suit for accounting and wound up as a general free-for-all melee.
Plaintiff H. P. Scheid brought suit naming as defendants V. E. Pinkham, V. V. Pinkham, and Ladeo Wood Brick Mills, Limited, a corporation. The substance of plaintiff’s claim was that he was a minority stockholder of the Ladeo Corporation and had been a minority of one on the three-man board of directors; that the two Pink-hams were majority stockholders and constituted the majority of the board of directors, as well as president and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. Brunson Const. Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Adelstein v. Jefferson Bank and Trust CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1964
- Thompson v. HodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
- J. G. Jackson Associates v. MosleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Commercial Nat. Bank of Kansas City, Kan. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Coonis v. RogersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Compton v. Williams Bros. Pipeline CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Scheid v. PinkhamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- Moore v. LunaMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- P. I. C. Leasing, Inc. v. Roy A. Scheperle Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1972
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.