Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ingram v. Army

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided June 12, 2019No. 18-2415Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential. United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________ HARROLL INGRAM, Petitioner v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, Respondent ______________________ 2018-2415 ______________________ Petition for review of the Merit Systems Protection Board in No. AT-1221-17-0498-W-1. ______________________ Decided: June 12, 2019 ______________________ HARROLL INGRAM, Sanford, FL, pro se. KRISTIN MCGRORY, Commercial Litigation Branch, Civil Division, United States Department of Justice, Wash- ington, DC, for respondent. Also represented by JOSEPH H.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Anthony R. Hambsch, III v. Department of the Treasury, United States Secret ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
  3. Commercial Contractors, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  4. Stanley B. Parker v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  5. Crawford v. Department of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API