Legal Opinion

R. R. v. . Comrs.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 19, 1919PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOKE, J., concurs in result; CLARK, C.J., dissenting. This is an action to recover the amount of a tax levy of five cents paid under protest.

The parties have agreed upon the following facts:

"1. That in the year 1918 the commissioners of Bladen County levied taxes for ordinary county purposes, which, with the State taxes, amounted to sixty-six and two-thirds cents on property of the value of $100, and in addition thereto levied a special tax of fifteen cents for schools, and in addition thereto, levied a tax of five cents, which last tax is the tax in controversy in this action.
"2. That the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Collie v. Commissioners of Franklin CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Moose v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. French v. . Commissioners of New HanoverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. Southern Railway Co. v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  5. Southern Railway Co. v. Cherokee CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. R. R. v. . ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Power Co. v. . Clay CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  3. Nantahala Power & Light Co. v. County of ClaySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  4. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API