Norfolk Southern Railroad v. Reid
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
Tbe plaintiff bases its claim to injunctive relief on tbe ground tbat tbe tax levied for general county purposes is in excess of tbe constitutional limitation, and therefore illegal. C. S., 858, 7979. There is no suggestion tbat tbe tax was levied in breach of Article VII, section 7, of tbe Constitution, or tbat tbe maintenance of tbe county borne and tbe building and repairing of bridges do not involve a necessary expense. Long v. Comrs., 76 N. C., 273; Herring v. Dixon, 122 N. C., 420. But tbe plaintiff says tbat tbe act purporting to authorize the levy of an annual tax in addition to tbe…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Brodnax v. GroomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1870
- Hauselt v. HarrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Jones v. Commissioners of Person CountySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
- Herring v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
- Moose v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re the Appeal of Springmoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1997