Legal Opinion

Keeler v. Mayor & City Council of Cumberland

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided October 15, 1996No. Civil Action S-96-167PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

SMALKIN, District Judge.

This action is before the Court on the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment on Counts II, III, VI, VII and IX of their amended complaint. The defendants have opposed the motion. The issues having been fully briefed, no oral hearing is necessary. Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.).

Factual and Procedural Background

The plaintiffs in this action, Cardinal William H. Keeler, Roman Catholic Archbishop of Baltimore, and Sts. Peter and Paul’s Roman Catholic Congregation, Inc. (collectively “the Church”), sue the City of Cumberland for permission to demolish a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye, Inc. v. City of HialeahSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security DivisionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Korean Buddhist Dae Won Sa Temple v. SullivanHawaii Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Northridge Church v. Charter Township of PlymouthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
  3. Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
  4. C.L.U.B. v. City of ChicagoDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
  5. Roman Catholic Bishop v. City of SpringfieldDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API