Legal Opinion

Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Boysen

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 7, 1962No. 13943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order denying a temporary injunction. Appellants sought the injunction to restrain the payment of attorney’s fees to the attorney for the water master in a pending suit. They claimed that the attorney was appointed by a void order. The issue is whether two District Judges who entered orders were disqualified, one because he was an attorney in the case, and the other because of his relative’s interest.

The Hon. Magus F. Smith, as Judge ot the 93rd Judicial District, entered an order during February, 1961, which discharged one attorney and appointed John Snedeker to…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Evans v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  2. Love v. WilcoxTexas Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Dallas v. PeacockTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Slaven v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1882
  5. State v. Valmont PlantationsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rogers v. BradleyTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Cameron v. GreenhillTexas Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. StarleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  4. State v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement District No. EighteenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969
  5. Kennedy v. Staples, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API