Legal Opinion

Irving Tanning Co. v. Shir

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided September 9, 1936PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtQua, J.

The plaintiff, a tanner of leather with an office in Boston, seeks to recover the purchase price of three shipments of tanned white sheepskins claimed to have been ordered by the defendants in April, 1934. The skins in each instance were shipped by the plaintiff to the Indian Head Shoe Company, which operated a shoe factory at Nashua, New Hampshire. The defences now insisted upon are a general denial and the statute of frauds.

*382For about a year before the shipments the Indian Head Shoe Company had sold substantially its entire output to the defendants, who were wholesalers in Boston, doing…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boice-Perrine Co. v. KelleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
  2. A. T. Stearns Lumber Co. v. HowlettMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  3. Colpitts v. L. C. Fisher Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Hammond Coal Co. v. LewisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  5. Theisen v. Detroit Taxicab & Transfer Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1918

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Linkage Corp. v. Trustees of Boston UniversityMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
  2. United States v. Stephen J. FlemmiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  3. Puritan Medical Center, Inc. v. CashmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  4. Rex Lumber Co. v. Acton Block Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1990
  5. Inn Foods, Inc., D/B/A U.S. Food Service v. Equitable Co-Operative BankCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API