United States v. Mensah
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.
Appellant David Mensah successfully negotiated the complexities of United States immigration law twice: first, to be come a naturalized citizen under his own name and, second, to obtain a diversity visa under the false name Willberforce Ap-piah. His success, however, was short-lived. The government detected Mensah’s double dipping, and he was subsequently found guilty by a jury on a charge of unlawful procurement of naturalization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a), based on his concealment of his Appiah identity. On appeal, Mensah raises a host of errors, ranging from…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Sanchez v. RodenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Rakesh HiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. MunyenyeziCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- D-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.