Legal Opinion

United States v. Mensah

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided December 16, 2013No. 19-1344PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge.

Appellant David Mensah successfully negotiated the complexities of United States immigration law twice: first, to be come a naturalized citizen under his own name and, second, to obtain a diversity visa under the false name Willberforce Ap-piah. His success, however, was short-lived. The government detected Mensah’s double dipping, and he was subsequently found guilty by a jury on a charge of unlawful procurement of naturalization, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a), based on his concealment of his Appiah identity. On appeal, Mensah raises a host of errors, ranging from…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Arizona v. GantSupreme Court of the United States · 2009

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Sanchez v. RodenCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. CaseyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016
  3. United States v. Rakesh HiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  4. United States v. MunyenyeziCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  5. D-RBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2017

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API