Allen v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railroad
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
Homer O. Allen, plaintiff in the trial court, has appealed from an order dismissing his petition for damages under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act, 45 U.S. C.A. § 51 et seq., in which he sought to invoke the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, because he refused to comply with an order of the trial court sustaining defendant’s motion for a more definite statement.
Respondent has filed a motion in this court to dismiss the appeal for failure of appellant to comply with Supreme Court Rule 1.08, 42 V.A.M.S. Appellant’s brief falls short of what is contemplated by the clear and…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCloskey Ex Rel. McCloskey v. KoplarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1932
- Jesionowski v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. KuhnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Zichler v. St. Louis Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
- Kansas City Stock Yards Co. v. A. Reich & SonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. ThomasMissouri Court of Appeals · 1958
- Parlow v. Carson-Union-May-Stern CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Mahan v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1988
- Gateway Chemical Company v. GrovesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1960
- State Ex Rel. Harvey v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.