Nelson v. Montgomery Ward & Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas
The issue in this case is identical with that in Nelson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., ante, p. 359. Respondent is an Illinois corporation authorized to do business in Iowa. Respondent operates retail stores and mail order houses throughout the United States. It has 29 retail stores 1 and several order offices in Iowa. It collects the Iowa tax on sales made at the retail stores and on sales handled by those order offices. But it has refused to collect the tax 2 on orders sent directly from Iowa customers to its out of state mail order houses and filled by direct shipments through the mails or a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of Sanford v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Swift & Co. v. Hocking Valley Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Felt & Tarrant Manufacturing Co. v. GallagherSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. RoddewigSupreme Court of Iowa · 1940
3Cited by77 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Miller Brothers Co. v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. Department of RevenueSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Guerrero-Lasprilla v. BarrSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Norton Co. v. Department of Revenue of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.