Legal Opinion
People v. Grady
New York Supreme Court
Decided November 26, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Bernard J. Fried, J.
Following the service of a defense trial subpoena duces tecum, attorneys representing the Atlantic Insurance Company moved to quash asserting that the material sought constituted attorney’s work product under CPLR 3101 (c). At the time the District Attorney orally served an identical subpoena which was accepted on behalf of Atlantic. A briefing schedule was fixed, written submissions were filed (except by the District Attorney who responded orally) and a hearing was held.
At the hearing, the scope of the subpoena was narrowed to three documents: (1) a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- People v. GissendannerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re Myron FarberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- People v. MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
3Cited by3 opinions
- People v. KozlowskiNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
- Sullivan v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- People v. AndersonNew York Supreme Court · 1993