Legal Opinion

Mills v. Warner Lambert Co.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 2005No. 03-1052PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Per curiam

This case involves an interlocutory appeal of a class-certification order. The primary issue is whether the portions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) regulating nonprescription drugs deprived the trial court of subject matter jurisdiction to hear claims regarding the efficacy of certain head-lice remedies. The court of appeals concluded that the FDCA preempted the class’s state-law claims and deprived the trial court of jurisdiction to enter its class-certification order. We disagree with the court of appeals’ conclusion that the trial court lacked subject matter…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  3. Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Maryland v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. San Diego County District Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. MCI Sales and Service, Inc. v. HintonTexas Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Bic Pen Corp. v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Lone Star College System and Richard Carpenter v. Immigration Reform Coalition of Texas (IRCOT), Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  4. Ambulatory Infusion Therapy Specialist, Inc. v. North American Administrators, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2008
  5. Mills v. Warner-Lambert Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API