Legal Opinion
Nyquist v. United States
District Court, D. Montana
Decided February 24, 1964No. Civ. 2231PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge.
On January 2, 1959, the United States, through the Department of the Army, •entered into a contract with Hood Construction Company, a California Corporation, Cherf Bros., Inc., a Washington ■corporation, and Sandkay Contractors, Inc., a Washington corporation, whereby the contractors, acting in joint venture were to construct a water supply line from the Missouri River to Glasgow Air Force Base. Part of this pipeline traversed land owned by the plaintiffs.
On July 3, 1961, plaintiffs filed an action against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. HullCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1952
- Strangi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
- Hopson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1956
- Peter Buchanan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
- A. M. Holter Hardware Co. v. Western Mortgage & Warranty Title Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Delora Huff Page, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Stanley James Pageand Jenny Lynn Page, MinorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- Barbara Ellen Eutsler, Individually and as Guardian Ad Litem of Brian Charles Eutsler, a Minor v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
- Hamman v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Montana · 1967
- McGarry v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1973
- Richardson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.