Legal Opinion · Concurrence

California Attorneys, Administrative Law Judges & Hearing Officers in State Employment v. Schwarzenegger

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 28, 2009No. C058415Published

1Concurrence

SCOTLAND, P. J., Concurring.

This litigation falls under the category of “be careful what you ask for.”

Edmund G. Brown, Jr., as a candidate for Governor in the general election of 1974, “said repeatedly” that he favored the passage of a bill to authorize collective bargaining for state employees, a goal that “[s]weeping victories for labor-endorsed candidates” was “expected to ensure” (Bernstein, Labor Bills’ Chances Improve, L.A. Times (Nov. 8, 1974) p. Cl). Victorious on election day, Governor Brown used his influence the following year to conduct “marathon talks to get a consensus behind a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neighbours v. Buzz Oates EnterprisesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990
  2. Squaw Valley Ski Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. Souza v. LauppeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  4. People v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Williams v. County of San JoaquinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API