Legal Opinion

Philbrook v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided February 14, 1941No. 11744PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The appellants were tried and convicted under an indictment in thirty-one counts, thirty of which charged them and some fifty other persons with violations of 18 U.S.C.A. § 338 (the Mail Fraud Statute). In the thirty-first count of the indictment they were charged with a conspiracy to violate § 338 (18 U.S.C.A. § 88).

The appellants challenge the procedure followed by the court below in impaneling1 the jury to try the case.

The appellant Philbrook, who was convicted oxi only the thirty-first count of the indictment, in addition contends that the verdict against him is…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Dunn v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Pointer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Stilson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  5. Sawyer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1906

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Holmes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. KeeganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  4. United States v. Charles Bradley AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
  5. State v. LizotteSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1969

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API