Legal Opinion

Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. Somers

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 9, 1888No. 2579PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before W. C. Jones, Esq., Special District Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Gaines, Associate Justice.

The appellee, who was plaintiff below, was a brakeman in the service of the appellant company, working upon a freight train. His place of duty upon the train was in the caboose, upon which the brake was defective. The handle in the car would set the brakes, but would not throw them off. The defect was well known to appellee. While the train was in motion, it became necessary for him to go to the rear platform of the car and down upon the lower steps and to stoop so as to throw off the brakes by the use of an implement which he took with him for the purpose. While in…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. Boston & Lowell RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
  2. Brossman v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Ry. Co. v. GarrettTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1905
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. HawleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1909
  4. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. BryantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1894
  5. Pennsylvania Co. v. FinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1896

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API